USPTO serial 79078685
ANTARCTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTARCTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Brian Johnson
R BRIAN JOHNSON SUMMA ADDITON ASHE PA11610 NORTH COMMUNITY HOUSE ROADCHARLOTTE, NC 28277UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |