USPTO serial 79078691
Serial No. 79078691
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79078691?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Skinner
Kathleen A. Skinner Beeson Skinner Beverly, LLPOne Kaiser PlazaSuite 750Oakland, CA 94612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, perfumery, eau de Cologne, toilet water; body milks, cosmetic lotions for the body, cosmetic gels for the body, cosmetic body oils, body powders; shower gels, soaps; bath salts, not for medical purposes; non-medicated cosmetic bath preparations; moisturising creams; deodorants for personal use; body lotions, shampoos and hair creams; make-up products, namely, make-up, lipsticks, cosmetic pencils, mascara, make-up foundations; nail varnishes for cosmetic purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Prescription eyeglasses, sunglasses, spectacle cases, contact lenses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewellery; fashion jewellery; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments; boxes of precious metal; hat ornaments of precious metal; jewellery chests; fashion pins being jewelry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | holders for checkbooks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather; furniture coverings made of leather or imitation leather; bags, namely, dufflebags, tote bags; handbags, evening handbags, sports bags, travel bags; shopping nets, namely, mesh shopping bags, leather shopping bags; attaché cases, envelopes being bags for packaging of leather, card cases being wallets, credit card wallets, purses, school bags; trunks and suitcases; leather or imitation leather hat boxes; umbrellas, parasols; leashes for animals, collars for animals; whips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, underwear, underclothings, shirts,tee-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, trousers, skirts, dresses, bermudas, shorts, socks, stockings, tights, belts, ties, stoles, scarves, jackets, coats, anoraks, raincoats; parkas; footwear; headwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |