USPTO serial 79078693
G-CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4033248Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G-CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
48565 Steinfurt, DE
48565 Steinfurt, DE
48565 Steinfurt, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Ascending ladders of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Elevators; hydraulic lifts and winches for transporting passengers and loads; elevating work platforms; conveyor equipment, namely, conveyor belts and lifting apparatus, namely, lifting work platforms | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation and repair of elevators, lifts, winches, climbing aids, conveyor equipment and inspection devices for roofs and facades | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by goracon engineering GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by goracon engineering GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by goracon engineering GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named G-CONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |