Drawing for BLINK LASH STYLIST

USPTO serial 79078695

BLINK LASH STYLIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3927861Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2011
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLINK LASH STYLIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jun-Hwa Jeong

Jun-Hwa Jeong RABIN & BERDO, P.C.Suite 500, 1101 14th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cake flavourings being essential oils; essential oils for food flavorings; essential oils for flavoring beverages; food flavorings prepared from essential oils; anti-static preparations for household purposes; non-slipping wax for floors; non-slipping liquids for floors; laundry glaze; fabric softeners for laundry use; laundry wax; laundry blueing; bleaching preparations laundry; javelle water being laundry bleach; potassium hypochloride being laundry bleach; canned pressurized air for cleaning and dusting purposes; floor wax removers; scouring preparations; oil of turpentine being degreasing preparations, not used in manufacturing processes for use on floors and automotive engines; bleaching soda being bleaching preparations for household use; bleaching salts; bleaching preparations for household purposes; leather bleaching preparations being leather cleaning preparations; starch glaze for laundry purposes; laundry starch; non-medicated breath freshening sprays; mouth washes, not for medical purposes; toothpaste in soft cake; non-medicated dental rinses; denture polishes being denture cleaning preparations; denture cleaning preparations; dental bleaching gels; tooth powders; teeth cleaning lotions; tooth cleaning preparations; dentifrices; boot cream; shoe wax being shoe polish; shoe cream; cobblers' wax; furniture polish; polish for furniture and flooring; leather preservatives being leather polishes; waxes for leather being leather polishes; creams for leather; polishing wax; polishing preparations, namely, polishing rouge; polishing stones, namely, tripoli stone for polishing; polishing creams being polishing preparations; floor polishes; floor wax; floor waxes in liquid form; preparations to make the leaves of plants shiny; tailors' wax; parquet floor wax; emery boards; emery paper; emery cloth; carbides of metal being abrasives strips; foot smoothing stones; diamantine abrasive sheets; abrasive pastes for razor strops; sandcloth being abrasive cloth; silicon carbide abrasive paste; polishing stones; abrasive sheets; abrasive rolls; abrasive sand; scouring solutions; grinding preparations, namely, dusting powder; abrasive paper; abrasive cloth; sharpening preparations, namely, abrasive paste; abrasive paste made of corundumSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 1, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 8, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 19, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 13, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 8, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 7, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 8, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 9, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance