Drawing for KONDO

USPTO serial 79078728

KONDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3903220Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 11, 2011
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KONDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel Bldg.Scarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Amplifiers; loudspeakers; [ styli for record players; compact disc players; tape recorders; ] record players; [ sound recording machines and apparatus; ] phono cartridges for record players; electrical phonomotors; [ headphones; microphones; public-address systems and instruments; ] electric transformers; electric switches; electric capacitors; electric resistors; electric wires and cablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 25, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 21, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 21, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 27, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 28, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 11, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance