Drawing for ENERGY GUARD

USPTO serial 79078756

ENERGY GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGY GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers, being protective coatings and primers against corrosion; preservatives against rust in the nature of coatingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Cleaning, maintenance and repair of apparatus for heating, ventilating, air conditioning, refrigerating and freezingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
040Treatment of materials, in particular the application of coatings on apparatus for heating, ventilating, air conditioning, refrigerating and freezingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 25, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 27, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 3, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance