Drawing for VISTA

USPTO serial 79078804

VISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Anti-friction bearings for machines; belts for conveyors; belt conveyors; belts for machines; adhesive bands for pulleysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 22, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance