USPTO serial 79078994
MANTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |