USPTO serial 79079029
E-CD ENI CIRCULATING DEVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3892793Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-CD ENI CIRCULATING DEVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; analysis, research, design and development services relating to technology used in drilling and completion of oil wells | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |