Drawing for NANOBUD

USPTO serial 79079110

NANOBUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COOPER, CHRISTINE H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOBUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering and soldering preparations; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning substances; adhesives used in industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 30, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 10, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 10, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 28, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 7, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 28, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 13, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 4, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance