Drawing for ALPINA

USPTO serial 79079252

ALPINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear, caoutchouc and canvas sewn shoes, vulcanized caoutchouc and canvas shoes, shoes covers, boots, ski boots, mountain and ski shoes, slippers, bath slippers, sandalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 1, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 4, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 28, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2010CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 10, 2010RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance