USPTO serial 79079254
ELITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3919004Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ELITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa C. Pavento
Lisa C. Pavento Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC999 Peachtree Street NESuite 1300Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joh. Winklhofer Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by iwis SE & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Joh. Winklhofer Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ELITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |