USPTO serial 79079350
OCTOPUS JULBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3903242Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2011
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCTOPUS JULBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-39400 LONGCHAUMOIS, FR
FR
FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Murray
Joseph T. Murray TWILL MURRAY LLP195 Columbia TurnpikeSuite 125Florham Park, NJ 07932Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacle lenses; spectacle lenses for sunglasses; lenses for sports eyewear; coated spectacle lenses; photochromic and polarising spectacle lenses; tinted spectacle lenses; photosensitive spectacle lenses | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |