Drawing for E K

USPTO serial 79079372

E K

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E K?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Money belts; leather shoes; basketball shoes; training shoes; baseball cap; top hat; leather belts clothing; stocking suspenders; raincoats; suits; skirts; children's clothing; infants' clothing; blue jeans; school uniforms; parkas; sweaters; cardigansSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance