Drawing for AQUAQUAKE

USPTO serial 79079407

AQUAQUAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3991748Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2011
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AQUAQUAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless marine communication equipment, namely, radio frequency amplifiers; marine transceivers; walkie-talkies for marine use; marine communication receivers, namely, mobile data receivers; radio frequency receivers for marine use; marine-band transceivers; wireless communication equipment for marine-band, namely, receivers of electronic signals; marine radios; marine radio communication machines and apparatusesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 14, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 16, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2010MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2010RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Apr 21, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance