Drawing for ARTICHOKE

USPTO serial 79079532

ARTICHOKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTICHOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zareefa Flener

Zareefa Flener Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, light fixtures, electric lamps, electric light bulbs, lamp chimneys, lamp mantles, lamp globes, ceiling lights, chandeliers, flourescent lamps for lightingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Retail store services and online retail store services featuring lighting apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design of interior decorSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance