USPTO serial 79079608
IHELP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IHELP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others and related consulting; advice in the field of business management and marketing; advisory services for preparing and carrying out commercial transactions; business management assistance and particularly carrying out tasks necessary for the smooth conduct of online sales; business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing and retail sale matters, assisting businesses in improvement of purchasing functions and business marketing consulting services; computerised on-line retail store services for the sale of goods and services of others; consulting in services in the field of internet marketing, sales techniques and sales programmes; customer service management for others including in the field of online retail store services, online account management and use of online services; customer services, namely, providing customer service inquiry services via telephone and e-mail for others; information or enquiries on business and marketing; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business administration, including such services provided on line or via the Internet; integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions on a global computer network; on-line advertising and marketing services; operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall; promoting the goods and services of others via a global computer network; providing information about the goods and services of others via the global computer network; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from an Internet web site particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods and services of others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Information technology consulting services including computer system administration for others, hosting and maintaining websites for others, remote management of computer applications for others and creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, getting feedback from their users, form virtual communities and engage in networking regarding selling and shopping online; computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software in the field of selling and shopping online; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services for vendors and customers to sell and shop online; consulting in the field of using information technology to buy and sell goods and services; consulting services and support in the field of design, selection, and use of computer hardware and software systems for others to buy and sell goods and services; consulting services, namely, designing, creating implementing and maintaining computer software for customers and vendors to buy and sell goods and services online; creation and maintenance of websites for others; design, creation, hosting, maintenance of websites for others; design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software used in connection with selling and shopping online; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems, monitoring of network systems and providing back-up computer programs and facilities in the field of selling and shopping online; technology advice provided to website users by means of a support hotline; tracking web sites of others to provide details about user click traffic or visits to a website in the field of selling and shopping online; providing a website for connecting sellers with buyers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2012 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |