Drawing for LA VIS

USPTO serial 79079742

LA VIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA VIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr.

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER PC1160 SPA ROADSUITE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, spirits and liqueursSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 24, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 2, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 12, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 11, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 1, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 1, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 11, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 6, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 29, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 29, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 29, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 29, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 8, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance