Drawing for ARALDITE

USPTO serial 79079763

ARALDITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4000466Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2011
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ARALDITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Strong adhesives for stationery and household purposes, adhesives for stationery and household purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 22, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 23, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 5, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 26, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 25, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 25, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance