Drawing for ARROGANT FROG

USPTO serial 79079844

ARROGANT FROG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3922204Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 22, 2011
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ARROGANT FROG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Red wines, rose wines, white wines [ ; sparkling wines]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 21, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 22, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 26, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 26, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Aug 6, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 12, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 30, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance