Drawing for BAGU

USPTO serial 79079925

BAGU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3968712Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 2011
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BAGU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jami A. Gekas

Jami A. Gekas Foley & Lardner LLP321 North Clark StreetSuite 3000Chicago, IL 60654-4762

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031[ Fresh fruits and vegetables; ] Fresh fruits [ and vegetables ], namely, oranges, mandarins, lemons [, onions, tomatoes, and fresh garden herbs ]ACTIVE—
039[ Services of packaging, storage, transport and distribution of all types of fresh fruits, vegetables and garden herbs ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 22, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 10, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 202171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 3, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2021PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jun 7, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 31, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 14, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 28, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 31, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 27, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance