Drawing for TRENDY PRONTO

USPTO serial 79080104

TRENDY PRONTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRENDY PRONTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, including lampsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Furniture, racks, cupboards, tables, mirrors, picture frames; goods not included in other classes, of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics, except kitchen units (furniture)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 18, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance