USPTO serial 79080112
QFC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QFC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Packing string; network; tents; bags of textile for packing; wadding for filtering; raw fibrous textile; wool flock; raw linen (flax); textile fibers; glass fibers for textile use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | Woollen thread and yarn; yarn; silk thread and yarn; darning thread and yarn; spun wool; elastic yarn for textile use; elastic thread for textile use; filament TERMS CONSIDERED TOO VAGUE BY THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU (RULE (13(2)(B)) OF THE COMMON REGULATIONS); rayon; woollen thread | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Cloth; textile material; fabrics for textile use; rayon fabric; printed calico cloth; shade cloth; curtains of textile; door curtains; towels of textile; bedsheet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |