USPTO serial 79080152
CORBENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3933814Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2011
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORBENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sugar confectionery; chocolate; articles of chocolate, namely, chocolate figures; pralines; pastries; all the aforesaid goods also containing spirits and wine; non-medical chewing gum | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |