Drawing for LIFTINSTITUUT

USPTO serial 79080161

LIFTINSTITUUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3933815Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 22, 2011
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFTINSTITUUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Kretzschmer

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training and courses, directly and indirectly related to lift technology, namely, training in the use and operation of lifts, providing courses in the field of lift technology; publishing magazines; organization of congresses and conferences for educational purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and inspections of technical apparatus and installations, concerning the transport of people and/or goods, namely, in particular in the field of lift technology; drawing up technical experts' reports in the field of the aforementioned services, namely, technical writing for othersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 31, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance