USPTO serial 79080238
CONTIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3936785Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2011
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
JEFFREY H. GREGER Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Heating, cooking and refrigerating apparatus designed for the foodstuff industry and for cooking and cooling food products, namely, automated immersion cookers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 29, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |