USPTO serial 79080443
FULING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Tableware (other than knives, forks and spoons) not of precious metal; enamel and plastic ware for everday use, including basins, bowls, plates, kettles, and cups; sticks for ice sucker TERMS CONSIDERED INCOMPREHENSIBLE BY THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU (RULE (13 (2) (B)) OF THE COMMON REGULATIONS); lunch boxes; utensils for household purposes, not of precious metal; covers for dishes; cups of paper or plastic; spoon for ice cream; services (tableware), not of precious metal; fitted picnic baskets (including dishes) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |