USPTO serial 79080520
NU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE B. SEYLER
JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit juices | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |