Drawing for RANGER

USPTO serial 79080677

RANGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RANGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Binoculars, telescopic sights and telescopes, all the aforesaid goods not for use in, or being parts for measuring or surveying apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 29, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 17, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance