Drawing for ONOFF

USPTO serial 79080804

ONOFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONOFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and their parts and fittings; two-wheeled motor vehicles, bicycles and their parts and fittingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 19, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 25, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance