USPTO serial 79080872
NERF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2011
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with NERF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
B-3000 LEUVEN, BE
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
B-3000 LEUVEN, BE
B-3000 Leuven, BE
B-9052 GENT, BE
B-9052 GENT, BE
B-3000 Leuven, BE
GENT, BE
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
LEUVEN, BE
Leuven, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller& Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor, Suite 501New York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development in the field of neuroscience and neuroelectronics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
- Other trademarks owned by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
- Other trademarks owned by IMEC vzw
- Other trademarks owned by VIB vzw
- Other trademarks owned by VIB vzw
- Other trademarks owned by IMEC vzw
- Other trademarks owned by VIB vzw
- Other trademarks owned by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, privaatrechtelijke rechtspersoon K.U. Leuven Research & Development
- Other trademarks owned by IMEC vzw
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NERF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 1, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |