Drawing for HI-PRO

USPTO serial 79080875

HI-PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3910387Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 25, 2011
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel C. Pierron

Daniel C. Pierron Widerman Malek PL1990 W. New Haven AveSuite 201Melbourne, FL 32904

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for audiometers and for audio logical balance assessment apparatus; computer hardware in the nature of computer interface boards and user interfaces for electrotechnical and electronic devices, namely, programmable hearing aidsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Apparatus and instruments for measuring hearing loss and for individualization of hearing aids, namely, audiometers and audio logical balance assessment apparatus; medical interface units comprised of medical hearing instruments and parts of such devices for individualization of hearing aids, all the aforesaid goods for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044[ Medical services in the field of hearing aids, namely, hearing clinics, audiology services, measuring of hearing loss, making of ear impressions, individualization and adjustment of hearing aids ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 20, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 6, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 6, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 22, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 25, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 30, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 31, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 201771.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 25, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Aug 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 5, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 6, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance