Drawing for LOGPRO

USPTO serial 79080949

LOGPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Car radiators for automobile; fuel filter for automobile; air filter for automobile; cooling water tank for automobile engines; gas recirculation system for automobile engines; muffler, exhaust system accessories for automobiles; air-intake manifolds, air-intake pipes for automobiles; exhaust resonators for automobile enginesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 29, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 15, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 4, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 4, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 22, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance