Drawing for THEDEADLINE

USPTO serial 79081196

THEDEADLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4069090Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2011
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THEDEADLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Henricks

James A. Henricks Henricks, Slavin & Holmes LLP840 Apollo StreetSuite 200El Segundo, CA 90245

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for task management excluding the field of render farm management systems within the television, film and animation industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 20, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 13, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 4, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 24, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance