USPTO serial 79081283
MAXRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3889420Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tomoko Nakajima
TOMOKO NAKAJIMA CERMAK NAKAJIMA LLP127 S. PEYTON STREET, SUITE 210ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric lamps; light bulbs; fluorescent lamps; spotlights; mercury lamps; ceiling lights; lighting apparatus and installations, namely, lighting installations using LED, inverter system lighting apparatus, and lighting installations for interior and exterior decoration | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |