USPTO serial 79081482
KINGDOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGDOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; computer game programs; computer programs for pre-recorded games; virtual reality game software; computer programmes programs, recorded; computer programs downloadable software; computer software for wireless content delivery; video game cartridges; software for processing images, graphics and text; apparatus for games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; computer application software for mobile phones; amusement apparatus adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Game services provided on-line from a computer network; gaming; providing amusement arcade services; provision of game information; provision of internet game centers by means of a computer based system; providing amusement arcade services; PC game room management; organization of games; rental of amusement machines; providing and operating of amusement facilities; providing of recreation facilities | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software development; development of game software; duplication of computer game software; maintenance of computer game software; computer game programming; web design; web site development; web site management; programming of multimedia applications; rental of computer software; development of computer game software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 29, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |