USPTO serial 79081508
L'ARC DE TRIOMPHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L'ARC DE TRIOMPHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beate Boudro
Beate Boudro, Esq. Beate Boudro, Attorney at Law4801 Lang Ave. NE, Suite 110Albuquerque, NM 87109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Mustard, mustard sauces; salad dressings, salad sauces; salad cream, namely, salad mayonnaise with less than 50% fat, salad mayonnaise; condiment sauces, namely, barbecue sauces, ketchup | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
- Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
- Other trademarks owned by Develey Holding; GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named L'ARC DE TRIOMPHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |