Drawing for NAIGAI VICARS

USPTO serial 79081517

NAIGAI VICARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4024574Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2011
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NAIGAI VICARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin A. Thompson

Kevin A. Thompson Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Confectionery making machines; bakery machines; food or beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, filling machines for foods and beveragesACTIVE—
011[ Freezers; central air-conditioning installations for industrial purposes; air-conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; ] cooking ovens for industrial purposes [ ; cooking equipment for industrial purposes, namely, industrial rice cookers and non-medical sterilizer retorts for use with cooking equipment ]ACTIVE—
037Machinery installation; building construction supervision; construction consultancy; repair or maintenance of freezing machines and apparatus; repair or maintenance of air-conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; repair or maintenance of machines and apparatus for processing foods or beverages; repair or maintenance of cooking apparatus for industrial purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 23, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 2, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 2, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 11, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 11, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 13, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 3, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 22, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance