Drawing for ISTAND

USPTO serial 79081523

ISTAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISTAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Jeffries

Stephen J. Jeffries Holland & Knight LLP2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 100Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Stands and holders adapted for audio players, mobile phones, personal digital assistants, portable television receivers and handheld computersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 3, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 12, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance