Drawing for T BAR

USPTO serial 79081555

T BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4008119Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2011
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 Camino Del MarSuite 250DEL MAR, CA 92014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SINGLETS, UNDERSHIRTS, SWEATERS AND SWEATSHIRTSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035WHOLESALE AND RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CLOTHING, HEADGEAR, AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, WHOLESALE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES, ELECTRONIC AND DIRECT MAIL CATALOGUE SERVICES, AND ON-LINE WHOLESALE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND THE INTERNETSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 9, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 29, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 29, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance