Drawing for MORPH

USPTO serial 79081561

MORPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3983470Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 28, 2011
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. W. Wong

David A. W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Baby carriers worn on the body; young infant carriers worn on the body; harnesses for carrying babies and infants; straps, namely, slings for carrying infantsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 28, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 1, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 15, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 18, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance