USPTO serial 79081568
OPENEXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPENEXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, including application programming interface for use with online services for social networking, for building social networking applications and for allowing data retrieval, upload, access and management | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Publicity services for others; providing databases containing user information, geographical information, advertisements and content (text, video, audio, photographs, images, comments, ratings and RSS feeds) and non-downloadable computer software for managing the content | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of creating, managing, storing, retrieving and transmitting text, video, audio, photographs, images, comments, ratings and RRS feeds through electronic and wireless communication networks and mobile devices; telecommunication services rendered in the scope of tagging content with geographical information; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of searching and locating people, places and content in real time, in the scope of sharing and displaying information about such people and places, displaying content and advertisements, commenting and rating people, places and content and in the scope of contacting people; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of engaging in social networking; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of providing search engine services; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of delivering search results based on geographic and behavioural data of a user and the delivery of relevant content; telecommunications services rendered in the scope of mapping and routing services, namely providing geographical information, map images and trip routing; providing on-line access to chat and discussion groups within the scope of social networking | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |