USPTO serial 79081605
JEANBOURGET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3919059Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JEANBOURGET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweaters, trousers, jackets, dresses, cardigans, coats, scarves, anoraks, shorts, tee-shirts, underwear, shirts, tights, socks, bathing suits; headgear, namely, hats, sun hats, caps; footwear excluding orthopaedic footwear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KIDILIZ GROUP
- Other trademarks owned by CREATION ET PRODUCTION
- Other trademarks owned by CREATION ET PRODUCTION
- Other trademarks owned by CREATION ET PRODUCTION
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JEANBOURGET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |