Drawing for EUREKA

USPTO serial 79081616

EUREKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4010951Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 16, 2011
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EUREKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kiranjit K Dharsan

Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter IP1110 N Virgil Ave, Suite #98436Los Angeles, CA 90029United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Pumps, namely, centrifugal pumps, water pumps for lifting seawater, submersible pumps, suction pumps and sludge pumps all for use in the oil and gas production and extraction processACTIVE—
009Pumps for fire extinguishing as part of a fixed fire fighting systems on oilfield installations, ships or plants/factoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jan 5, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2022EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 14, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 27, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 16, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 16, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2011FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jul 6, 2011ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 26, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 10, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance