Drawing for CHROME

USPTO serial 79081634

CHROME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHROME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Dusters, radiator cleaning apparatus (hand-operated), chamois leather for cleaning purposes, cleaning cloths; hand-operated / hand-driven wiping and cleaning apparatus for windows, walls, ceilings and floors; window, ceiling, wall and floor wipers; wiper mopsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 17, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance