USPTO serial 79081723
STP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4137345Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2012
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Limited liability company "Autoplastic"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company "Autoplastic"
Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel, Esq.
Sergei Orel, Esq. Law Office of Sergei Orel, LLC7000 Boulevard East, Suite 43-CGuttenberg, NJ 07093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | insulating paper for acoustical, acoustic, thermal and heat insulation of automobiles; insulating felt for automobiles; insulators for automobiles, namely, polyurethane and penopolyethylene insulators of interiors of automobile and other automobile parts from noise, heat and corrosion; insulating tape and band, adhesive bands being tapes all being other than stationery and not for medical or household purposes; soundproofing materials for automobiles; insulating materials; insulating refractory materials; rubber material for recapping tires or tyres; non-conducting materials for retaining heat, namely, insulating penopolietilen being polyethylene foam, polyurethane foam, and foam plastic membranes for insulating surfaces of automobiles; sealant compounds for joints; insulating plaster; cords of rubber for cylinder jointings, pipe gaskets and joint packings for pipes; non-metal gaskets for joint packings and seals in the automotive industry; substances for insulating buildings against moisture, namely, polyurethane film for use as a moisture barrier; fiberglass insulation for automobiles; insulating fabrics; waterproof packings for water-tight rings; foils of metal for insulating automobiles | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company "Autoplastic"
- Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
- Other trademarks owned by Limited liability company; "Autoplastic"
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named STP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |