USPTO serial 79081880
SIMTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3976587Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHERINE KEATING
KATHERINE KEATING Bryan Cave LLPThree Embarcadero Center, 7th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-4070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transportation of dangerous and/or hazardous goods and substances; warehousing, storage and distribution of dangerous and/or hazardous goods and substances; import and export cargo handling services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Constantine Logistics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Constantine Logistics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Constantine Logistics Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named SIMTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |