USPTO serial 79082022
B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3919065Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheshire, GB
Cheshire SK10 2XF, GB
Cheshire SK10 2XF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
Cathleen E. Stadecker Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC199 Main Street, P.O. Box 190Burlington, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, thermal processing of metal, alloys, ceramics and glass; metal joining services; hot isostatic pressing of metals, alloys, ceramics and glass for densification and the elimination of porosity; coating of metal, alloys, ceramics and glass, namely, thermal spray coating, thermal diffusion coating, polymer and organic surfacing, anodizing, and mechanical metal plating, all for applications in the manufacture of components for the aerospace and defense, agricultural, automotive, construction, consumer products, electrical, telecommunications, information technology, engineering, hydraulics, medical mining, oil and gas, power generation, rail, tooling and water industries; and providing advice and information in connection with material treatment of components manufactured for use in said industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design in the field of the thermal processing of metals and alloys; calibration services in the field of the thermal processing of metals and alloys; industrial analysis, research and design in the field of thermal processing of metals and alloys; and advice and information in the field of scientific, technological, research and design services in the field of thermal processing of metals and alloys, metal joining, hot isostatic pressing and surface technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |