USPTO serial 79082036
ÖGON -DESIGNS-
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4024577Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ÖGON -DESIGNS-?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-27930 Guichainville, FR
F-27930 Guichainville, FR
Guichainville, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | [ Pocketbooks; cases made especially for pocketbooks; cases of aluminum made especially for pocketbooks; ] card holders, namely, credit card holders, and wallets; cases made especially for business card holders in the nature of wallets and card cases for credit card, identity cards, visiting cards or loyalty cards; cases of aluminum made especially for card holders in the nature of wallets, and credit card holders; change purses; coin case containers, namely, cases made especially for holding coin purses and coin holders in the nature of wallets; aluminum coin case containers, namely, cases made especially for holding coin purses and coin holders in the nature of wallets; change holders for euros, namely, coin purses [, change purses, and wallets; change holder containers, namely, cases made especially for change purses and wallets; change holder containers in aluminum, namely, cases made especially for change purses and wallets ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 15, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |