Drawing for KINGGUARD

USPTO serial 79082241

KINGGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINGGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning, polishing and abrasive preparations; essential oils; creams and polishes, namely, leather preservativesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
004Oils and greases, namely, preservatives for fabrics, leather and imitation leatherSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 1, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 12, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 27, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance